jezebel
The tao of the Witch
The late Doreen Valiente thought that Taoism was the Eastern equivalent of witchcraft. I happen to agree with her. It casts witchcraft in an interesting light, though; so many people see it as “not quite a religion”, and as a vaguely occult path which is obsessed with herbs, spells and divination.
Taoism, via the I Ching, offers a very powerful divinatory system, of course, but it’s much wider than that. If I were to venture an opinion on how Taoism differs from its offspring, Zen Buddhism, it would be to say that Taoism is more implicitly accepting of the duality inherent in life and the resulting cycles in nature.
Zen focuses on meditation and enlightenment, and nothing else. It is about emptiness. Taoism, I think, embraces that emptiness (and I mean emptiness in the Buddhist sense of no-self, of inner void and tranquillity), but is far more accepting of the processes of life. The universe brings particles into being in pairs; a proton and an anti-proton, for example, and they annihilate in pairs and form other particles, and so matter and energy come into being and play. And eventually worlds form, and so do birds, trees, people, in a vast array of patterns, colours, shapes and varieties.
The Hindus call this Lila, the play of the gods. William Blake, the poet who was also reportedly a Druid Grand Master, said “Eternity is in love with the productions of time.” The infinite plays by making finite patterns, of which we are only one.
Understanding that may give us a view of witchcraft as a spiritual path, one which is in harmony with Nature, which understands the ultimate non-duality of things and yet embraces the Universe as divine and feminine, and experiences the unity underlying things. (And this is what this site is going to try to portray.)
This may give us an antidote to a society which, after a few years of vibrant feminist activism, seems to be sinking into an increasingly ugly misogyny and tolerance of patriarchy, as well as a narcissistic and poisonous focus on the individual which, I’m sorry to say, seems to be aided and abetted by New Age spirituality, which is becoming increasingly vapid and irrelevant; a form of Spirituality Lite for a generation which has abandoned compassion and community in favour of instant gratification, and technology instead of real communication (I plead guilty here; I do love my gadgets!
)
It’s an antidote which is badly needed in a world which seems determined to rush to its own destruction.
Mystical traditions in almost all religions have emphasised the need to let go of ego. In Christianity this has often been misinterpreted as some sort of grovelling humility; in other religions as what the catholics would call the sin of excessive self-mortification; but it is perhaps best expressed as simply letting go of self-importance and a grim clutching to personal identity, destiny and individuality.
If we experience little glimpses of the inner space that comes with non-ego, we realise that ego is a burden and that putting it down is a relief. Questions of afterlife and reincarnation then seem ridiculous; who would want an afterlife as themselves when they could just dissolve into everything? It’s like staying in a stuffy woollen suit on a hot day when you could just strip off and dive into a cool pond of water.
And so perhaps the tao of the Witch is to learn to dance on the cusp of the void, on the crystalline pinpoint, to play with the edge of enlightenment without dissolving fully. And to love Nature.
What does the world want of us?
I’ve said elsewhere that our gods and goddesses are imaginary; in a real sense which does seem to be supported by (shudder) modern physics, the universe is something of a grand illusion, and the only way we can approach it is through the limited tunnel provided by our senses.
Beyond the universe – the tao – is void, unknowable, something beyond the distinction of existing and non-existing. That is not god in any of the senses in which we humans form religious beliefs. Our gods are right here in the illusion with us.
Recovering the Goddess
The gods and goddesses we believe we worship are in essential ways imaginary, and yet they have a huge impact on our lives.
What do I mean by imaginary? Consider the opening chapter of the Tao Te Ching:
The Tao that can be spoken is not the eternal Tao
The name that can be named is not the eternal name
The nameless is the origin of Heaven and Earth
The named is the mother of myriad things
Thus, constantly without desire, one observes its essence
Constantly with desire, one observes its manifestations
These two emerge together but differ in name
The unity is said to be the mystery
Mystery of mysteries, the door to all wonders
Both the nameless and the named are concepts of our minds, and if there is an ultimate reality, it is beyond the ability of the naming and categorising mind to conceptualise. It is something which we may experience a little of, and only if we can silence the mind for a while, and experience ourselves on a level both quieter and more fundamental. This is why Buddhists, Taoists and some Western mystics avoid concepts like “the name of God”. It is not that God is so special that he or she cannot be named; it is that the act of naming creates a concept in the mind. And all concepts distance us from that experience of reality. Whether you think about Santa Claus, or Jesus, or abiding non-dual awareness, you are thinking about something, not experiencing it. Continue reading
What is – or isn’t – a feminist?
When I read articles and blog posts about feminism these days, I always come out feeling a bit as though my head has been put through The Tumbledryer At The End Of The Universe.
Anyone who mentions rape culture, or rape, or sexism, or That Shirt (the one which got caught in the spotlight during the Philae landing on the comet) immediately gets bombarded with accusations of not being a ‘real’ feminist because they’re not ‘inclusive’. And possibly they’re manhaters (or, god help me, “misandrists”. Misandry is not a thing, as I hope to show a little later.) Continue reading
Ayn Rand on Original Sin
I’m not normally a huge Ayn Rand fan. Because of her background and escape from the Soviet Union, she was, I think, too quick to discount the collective forces on us, and thus to judge people for thier individual failures when those failures were primarily the result of outside pressures.
But I’ve always loved her marvellous peroration against the toxic and morally bankrupt concept of original sin, from John Galt’s soliloquy in Atlas Shrugged. Here’s some of it: Continue reading
Look how spiritual I am
There was a time when enlightenment doctrines were secret, and only revealed after an acolyte had been through a period of teaching and initiation.
Undoubtedly some of this was just so teachers and high priests could milk the situation for every bit of authority and power they could extract. But there is also something to be said for not letting it all hang out.
Why?
Well, first, and perhaps most perniciously, there’s a sort of spiritual competitiveness around today, which is particularly noticeable in New Age circles. A lot of spiritual practice seems to be around making it clear to others that the devotee is very “spiritual” (a contradiction in terms), or “spiritually evolved” (an even bigger contradiction in terms), or has had his or her “consciousness raised” (I didn’t realise they’d dropped it). Continue reading
Is it spiritual to save the planet?
Buddhist monk Thich Nhat Hanh recently gave a rare interview to the Guardian, in which he talked about sustainable living as part of his teaching. He believes that a spiritual revival and a return to simpler lifestyles is a better option for tackling global warming than is technology.
He’s probably right. But the meat of the interview is in his understanding that we may well not succeed, that the sustainability issues facing us may well be the end of our civilisation. And that is ok with him. Continue reading
god is love
Oh no god isn’t.
The notion of an endlessly loving, kind and compassionate god, a god which is essentially personal, is extremely prevalent. But it is a human projection, and has much more to do with our enduring need to find the perfect parent than with anything we might be able to say about god. God, far from being compassionate and loving, is nothing of the sort, and the word “god” has so many confusing connotations that it might be better to dispense with it altogether. Continue reading
Why is there a Psychic Phase?
A lot of enlightenment literature says that the ego is just something you should “put down”, as though this was an easy act of will. I think this is unduly harsh and also unduly simplistic.
Certainly the ego will be gradually transcended, dissolved and eventually laid aside. And for some of us there may be a flash of blinding light, a conversion experience, which will precipitate this. Continue reading
A Day in the Life of the Soul
Reincarnation, past life regressions and investigations into karma-generating events are still very popular in spiritual circles. Are they necessary? Let’s think about it. We could argue that one human lifetime is rather like a day in the life of the soul, with dawn being the human birth and evening being the human death. This is far from being a new analogy (and has inspired poetry of variable quality over the years).
The argument continues that, just as our past influences the present, so our past lives influence our present lives; and this becomes a justification for focusing on this very intriguing and seductive makyo, or red herring.